Open data

The data behind this site

By Andrey Tadevosyan · Published 28 August 2026

Every number printed in these essays is computed by a script rather than typed into a sentence. That is worth nothing to a reader who cannot run the script, so the output is published here as plain CSV. Open it in a spreadsheet, check it against the pages, and tell us if it disagrees.

Why this exists

A site that argues for checking things has an obligation to be checkable. Most writing on numerology and angel numbers states a frequency — "you see 11:11 more than chance allows", "master numbers are rare" — without ever saying how it was worked out. Every such figure on this site comes out of the files below, and the whole space is enumerated rather than sampled, which is possible precisely because the claims are arithmetic.

These files are free to download, quote and republish, including commercially. An attribution link back to this page is appreciated and not required.

Life path numbers, every date from 1900 to 2025

All 46,021 real calendar dates — correct month lengths, correct leap years — with the life path number computed under both standard conventions.

Method A sums every digit of the full date and reduces once. Method B reduces the month, the day and the year separately and then sums those. Both are taught as "the" method. They disagree for 6,398 of the 46,021 dates — 13.90%, about one birthday in seven.

• life-path-by-date.csv 46,021 rows. Columns: date, life_path_method_a, life_path_method_b, methods_disagree.
• life-path-distribution.csv Counts and percentages for each life path number under both methods.

The distribution is the part worth looking at. Life paths 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 each take almost exactly one ninth of all birthdays — 11.11% apiece. The numerology tradition treats 11, 22 and 33 as rare and significant, and they are rarer, but not because anything selected them: each is carved out of an ordinary ninth. Life path 2 and life path 11 together are 11.11% — one ninth. The same holds for 4 with 22, and for 6 with 33. A master number is not an exception to the distribution. It is a relabelled slice of it, and 16.0% of people have one.

Clock times that read as notable

A twelve-hour clock has 720 distinct readings. The angel-number literature treats a time as significant if it repeats a digit, mirrors itself, matches the hour, or ascends. 128 of the 720 satisfy at least one of those rules — 17.8%, or roughly one glance in six.

• notable-clock-times.csv 128 rows, one per notable time, with a column per rule so you can see which rules each time satisfies.

That number is the whole of the angel-number frequency argument. Nobody needs a supernatural explanation for noticing a notable time when one in six of them qualifies. The angel number calculator turns this into a personal rate from how often you actually check the time.

How to reproduce all of it

Nothing here needs to be taken on trust. The generating code is short, dependency-free JavaScript, and the numbers on this page are recomputed from it every time the site is built — so a page that drifts from its own data cannot ship.

The three-six-nine result on why 3, 6 and 9 is derived the same way, and it is the clearest case of the method paying off: run the doubling sequence in base eight or base twelve and the "sacred" numbers change, because the pattern is a fact about base ten rather than about the universe.

Corrections

If a figure here is wrong, that is the most useful thing you can send us. Every claim on the site is graded on the sources page, every citation is resolved against Crossref before publication, and corrections are made in the page itself rather than quietly absorbed. The contact page is one address, read by the person who wrote all of this.